Wednesday, October 17, 2012

The Digital Fieldsite



            As I look at the website of Providence Animal Rescue League(PARL) I find many pictures of animals, as well as paw print with a heart inside serving as somewhat of a logo. This seems appropriate enough because the animal shelter’s first priority should be caring for and loving the animals. Therefore, advertising the animals represents the animal shelter in the best manner. The first thing I notice, textually, is the phrase “LOVE is adoptable at 34 Elbow St!” This message is clever because it explains what PARL’s purpose is, and gives its location. The second most prominent texts on the home page are the links to adopt, volunteer or donate. These three actions are important for PARL as well because the opportunity for people to adopt is a big purpose of the shelter, but volunteering and donating both keep the place running. Whoever designed this website made it certain that anyone visiting would know the main purposes of PARL and how anyone can contribute to them, whether it is big or small.

            I enjoyed the easy navigation of the website, because it makes it manageable for all ages, from preteens to grandparents. This is important because the love for animals, and the desire for pets, has no expiration date. PARL’s website needs to be accessible to everyone.

            The pure basis of the website makes me assume that the Providence Animal Rescue League cares. I mean, how can you not care when your job is to rescue animals in need? Everything that this organization is about is devotion and tenderness, so it’s easy to say that this subculture mirrors those qualities. Also, the constant array of animal’s photographs leads me to feel comfort and compassion for animals, because how could you not when you face a picture of an adorable kitten? This compassion is important for PARL because it will put people in the mood to donate or help in any way they can. Looking at a plan screen full of black text, it’s easy to ignore the donate button; but looking at a screen with a cat and dog staring out you, it’s easy to feel a desire to donate.  Although this seems kind of sneaky or conniving, it’s simply necessary in order to continue their work. I think it’s pretty innocent in the big scheme of things.


            The American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals(ASPCA) is definitely a heart-string-tugging website. The first pictures I see are those of dogs and cats looking sad and abandoned. Each picture has a name for the pet with a brief, provocative statement urging website visitors to do something, such as “Make a difference for 60¢ a day.” From this type of persuasion I sense a mildly manipulative subculture. At the same time, it is a website working for the animals; its slogan “We are their voice.” This type of work, similar to the Providence Animal Rescue League gives every reason for me to assume the subculture of ASPCA is caring and ultimately for the betterment of animals. One thing I find interesting about this website is that the acronym is prominently displayed, while the actual name of the organization isn’t. I suppose the reason for this is the long title, but I feel like having the actual name is important, especially for people like me who aren’t familiar with the organization/acronym.

            ASPCA has a broader website because it has a lot of information. It has similar links to PARL, such as donating, adopting, etc. but each link has sub-links underneath it. They also have an additional animal cruelty link, allowing those visiting the website to report animal cruelty and many articles related to cruelty such as hoarding or how to recognize it. Although PARL’s website is separate from ASPCA it makes sense that they are linked because PARL is simply a more focused, local version of ASPCA.

3 comments:

  1. Kristen, I really like how you compare PARL and ASPCA! I also love how you point out specific things, explaining how they relate to compassion and love for animals:)

    ReplyDelete
  2. Kristen, I'd just like to start by saying you are a bundle of fun. As I navigate through your blog, it just screams fun! It makes me so excited to read your posts. In the same way, you show your love for animals. Although I havent visited this website, I can visualize everything you say! Something that stood out to me was when you were describing how this website pulls on the viewers heartstring in order to get them to donate. Have you ever seen the animal abuse commercials on TV? The way both examples show pictures of the animals, and get the viewer to say an un-verbal "Aw!" makes people want to give! It's great that you picked up on that! I agree with you, I do think this is a harmless pull. At the least, I would call this an intelligent marketing technique! I enjoyed reading your post. I can see the effort and time you spent on this, all to create an awesome post!

    ReplyDelete
  3. Kristen! Since your place/subculture relies on the kindness of human beings to stay open and vital, it is only natural that their website would be rhetorically situated to make us, the readers, have an emotional reaction, just like those commercials Kristin Willis mentions. I would like to think that we, as people, have a knee-jerk reaction to help when seeing an animal or person in distress (though I know I sort of live in a fantasy land in this regard, too). I want you to think more about this concept: PARL, like the ASPCA and the Humane Society of the United States, all have a mission which is completely dependent on people's emotional (and financial) response to animals in distress. Therefore, the writers and designers of their websites have to appeal to us in these ways. How is this different from, say, the website for DCYF, a government/state agency, or St. Mary's Home for Girls, an orphanage across the street from RIC, organizations that also try to appeal to our emotional response to the mistreatment/abuse of children. My question stems from this place: Do we regard animals over people in our society? I just read that Americans will spend 70 million dollars this year on Halloween costumes for their pets. And, I know for a fact that there are kids in my very own neighborhood in Providence who are only eating one meal a day. Seriously??

    I would love for you to get curious about this and to explore it more. To what length will we go in this country to rescue and protect pets? Children?

    ReplyDelete